Star Wars: Rebels - S1E6 - "Breaking Ranks"

Recently, I lookt at the trivia for the Star Wars: Rebels episode "The Occupation" (S4E5).  The earlier episode "Breaking Ranks" (S1E6), specifically the Imperial cadet Oleg, is referenced, and I had a few realizations about it.

In "Breaking Ranks," Ezra poses as cadet Dev Morgan in order to infiltrate the Imperial facility on Lothal and acquire a device that will allow The Ghost crew to locate an Imperial shipment containing a Kyber crystal.  During his time there, he befriends fellow cadets Jai Kell and Zare Leonis.  These three contrast with Oleg in superficial ways that mirror deeper differences in their characters.

Ezra Bridger (even undercover as Dev Morgan), Jai Kell, and Zare Leonis all have first and last names, and their last names highlight their familial connections:  although he's separated from them, Ezra has a strong attachment to his parents, and he recently joined his Rebels family; Jai mentions that his family consists of just him and his mother; and Zare is looking for his sister, who disappeared from the academy.  Oleg's single name seems to indicate that he lacks a family; all he has is the Empire.

Throughout the episode, Ezra, Jai, and Zare frequently take off their helmets or at least open the face panel, but Oleg is never seen without his.  That Oleg remains faceless illustrates that his individuality is being subsumed as he becomes part of the standardized Empire.

Both of these contrasts also match the difference in the characters' ties to the Empire.  Ezra was never truly a cadet; he was only working undercover at the academy.  Jai defects at the end of the episode, after Ezra and Zare explain the true nature of the Empire to him.  While Zare does stay at the academy, he does so only to continue searching for his sister, not because of any true allegiance.  Oleg, on the other hand, was always loyal to the Empire.

---&---

In re-watching the episode, I noticed some small significance in one of the Inquisitor's statements.  Upon reviewing the events at the academy, he looks at images of Jai and Ezra and says, "I do not know this boy [Jai], but this one [Ezra] I know."  His comment has a chiastic structure, which emphasizes these opposites:

I do not know

this boy,

but this one

I know.

[A couple years ago, I wrote a post about the opening shot of this episode.]

The Terminal

Earlier this month, I was thinking about The Terminal again, and I re-watched it in order to look into a couple points (also because I've been watching a lot of Steven Spielberg movies recently).

The second time that Viktor Navorski meets Amelia Warren, he lends her his handkerchief.  When she returns it, she asks him, "What's BH?" mistaking the Cyrillic letters of his monogram for Latin letters (in full, his name is something like Виктор Наворски in Cyrillic).  In a small way, her assumption that the letters are Latin matches what she says about herself shortly before this:  "I always see men the way I wanna see 'em."

Later, the two meet by chance in Borders, where Amelia is buying a book about Napoleon.  She tells Viktor that Napoleon is "one of my favorites," and Viktor subsequently develops his own interest in Napoleon.  His primary motivation seems to be a desire to have something in common with Amelia, but he may also identify with Napoleon because their situations are similar.  Amelia tells him, "After he loses the Battle of Waterloo, Napoleon isolates himself on the tiny island of St. Helena."  (According to Britannica, Napoleon became a recluse while he was exiled there, so this is isolation even within confinement.)  To some degree, Viktor is also isolated because he's stuck in the terminal.

[The Terminal is my favorite movie, and I've written about it multiple times now.  Click here for all of my posts about it.]

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

A couple months ago, I ran across the word bodhisattva ("a being that compassionately refrains from entering nirvana in order to save others and is worshipped as a deity in Mahayana Buddhism") and learned that the Sanskrit word bodhi means enlightenment.  This reminded me of the character Bodhi Rook in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, so I watched the movie again to see what connection the word and its meaning have to the character (also because I recently finished watching Andor, which immediately precedes Rogue One chronologically).

If the character's name is meant to indicate an enlightenment, this enlightenment (the realization of the Empire's oppression and terror) seems to have occurred before the events of the movie.  By the time Bodhi appears, it's well established that he has defected from the Empire.  He tells Jyn, "Your father, he said I could get right by myself.  He said I could make it right if I was brave enough to listen to what was in my heart.  Do something about it."  While the actual moment of his enlightenment isn't shown, it continues to motivate his actions.

---&---

For what it's worth:  this isn't the first instance of Sanskrit in Star Wars.  There are some Sanskrit words in "The Duel of the Fates" near the end of The Phantom Menace.  At about 3:11 in a featurette titled "Movie Music," John Williams explains to the choir that "I've chosen these Sanskrit words because of the, the quality of the vowels."

Star Wars - Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

Earlier this week, I watched Star Wars - Episode III: Revenge of the Sith on the twentieth anniversary of its release (19 May).  Because I've been reading The Art of Star Wars - Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, I've been thinking about some of the visual elements of the movie, and I had a suspicion about the closing shots that I was able to confirm.

The last scenes show the four members of the Skywalker family.

Padmé at her funeral procession:

Anakin, now Darth Vader, watching the construction of the Death Star:

Leia on Alderaan:

Luke on Tatooine:

Various aspects of these scenes highlight how Vader now differs from the others.

Padmé, Leia, and Luke are each accompanied by family, but Vader joins the Emperor and Tarkin, powerful figures in the new Empire.  Since Padmé's dead and Leia and Luke are infants, they're mostly passive in these scenes (Luke seems to be asleep), but Vader strides down the bridge of the Star Destroyer.  In contrast to the natural locations the others are shown in, Vader's environment is completely artificial (as if to match Obi-Wan's "more machine now than man" comment in Return of the Jedi), and while the colors on Naboo, Alderaan, and Tatooine may not be particularly vivid, there's a greater variety in each than on the Star Destroyer bridge, which is primarily grayscale.

---&---

During Anakin and Obi-Wan's duel over the lava on Mustafar, Anakin uses the Force to control a mining droid* so that, standing on top of it, he can move closer to the platform where Obi-Wan is and continue the fight.  In a small way, this imposition of his will upon the droid demonstrates a quality that's part of his character now that he's turned to the dark side (his "lust for power" as Obi-Wan calls it).  As Anakin told Padmé shortly before this, they can now "make things the way we want them to be."

---

*I have to credit LEGO Star Wars in 100 Scenes (p. 94) for pointing this out to me.  In the movie, what Anakin is doing isn't as obvious, but when he leaps from the droid's head to the other side of Obi-Wan's platform, the droid zooms off on its own again, suddenly released from Anakin's hold.

Star Wars: Rebels - S4E9 - "Rebel Assault"

Last week, I watched the Star Wars: Rebels episode "Rebel Assault" (S4E9) and noticed some significance in the composition of one shot.  After the squad of Rebels on Lothal sees that the assault led by Hera has failed and that all the Rebels ships have been shot down, there's a wide angle view showing both the falling ships and the Rebels helplessly watching them:

The framing isn't level with the horizon, and this skewed perspective matches the unsettled nature of the characters' feelings:  dismay that the attack has failed and uncertainty about what has happened to Hera.

Rear Window

This post contains spoilers.

Months ago, I had a couple thoughts about Rear Window, and I watched the movie again recently in order to develop them.

Initially, I was considering only a scene near the end.  Thorwald has figured out that Jefferies is the one behind an informal investigation into the murder of Thorwald's wife, and he enters his apartment, at first merely to confront him but then to attack him.  Jefferies uses flash bulbs to stun Thorwald temporarily, slowing his progress until Jefferies' police friend Doyle arrives.  Perhaps just coincidentally, Jefferies' use of the flash bulbs here illustrates literally what he's also doing metaphorically:  exposing Thorwald.

While this is exposure in a more general sense, not the specific sense as in photography, it also got me thinking about Jefferies' profession and its significance in the plot.  The first scenes of the movie explain that Jefferies is a photographer who broke his leg after stepping out onto a racetrack to get an action shot.  While he's convalescing, he starts watching his neighbors, eventually suspecting Thorwald of murdering his wife.  Particular characteristics of his career as a photographer make him especially suited for this endeavor.  Most obviously, he's observant, and this quality allows him to notice changes in his neighborhood and details in the Thorwalds' apartment specifically.  His experience also gives him insight into Thorwald's demeanor.  As Thorwald looks out into the courtyard the day after murdering his wife, Jefferies tells Stella, the insurance company nurse, that "that's no ordinary look; that's the kind of a look a man gives when he's afraid somebody might be watching him."  Shortly after he says this, he starts observing Thorwald with binoculars but soon exchanges them for his camera, which provides him with a greater magnification, an asset others wouldn't have.

Later, he's able to deduce that Thorwald had buried something in the garden, partially because he saw an-other neighbor's dog snooping around but primarily because on a slide, he has an image of the flower bed from about two weeks ago, which he compares with the current view.  "Those two yellow zinnias in this end aren't as tall as they were.  Now since when do flowers grow shorter in two weeks?"  The occupations of the other neighbors wouldn't allow for such a direct comparison as Jefferies has access to.  Once again, his profession gives him an advantage in suspecting and ultimately exposing Thorwald as a murderer.

Bones - S1E9 - "The Man in the Fallout Shelter"

Back in November, I started over in re-watching Bones so I could follow along with the Boneheads podcast (although I've never caught up to the podcast's current episode).  Last week, I watched "The Man in the Fallout Shelter" (S1E9) and noticed some significance in the framing.

During a video call near the beginning of the episode, the Jeffersonian team and Agent Booth receive details about the possible biological contamination to which they've been exposed.  Although they're all in the same room, only one or two characters are visible in each shot, and throughout the scene, every character is shown alone at least once:

These shots illustrate the characters' isolation, both generally (they're all confined to the lab) and individually (each character is now unable to spend Christmas with those he or she had planned to spend it with).

Later, there's a shot whose composition seems meant deliberately to contrast with these.  In a rather artificial arrangement (as if posed for the camera's benefit), the characters are sitting on one side of a table, so that they're all viewed more or less equally:

Instead of the separation of the previous shots, there's a sense of togetherness here, and this also matches the plot:  during this time of confinement, the characters have learned more about each other and grown closer.

Additionally, multiple aspects of this shot (the framing, the characters' positions, and its presentation of a meal) resemble Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper:

[source]